The Science of Tracking
| Revision as of 05:12, 7 December 2006 (edit) Paul (Talk | contribs) (→The Requisites for Accurate Tracking) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 05:13, 7 December 2006 (edit) Paul (Talk | contribs) (→''Phase-rate or Doppler measurement'') Next diff → |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| Spacecraft position may also be calculated entirely without angle data from three tracking stations using a triangulation technique with the known base-line lengths between the stations and the ranges from the three stations which intersect at the spacecraft as the apex – just simple spherical trigonometry. | Spacecraft position may also be calculated entirely without angle data from three tracking stations using a triangulation technique with the known base-line lengths between the stations and the ranges from the three stations which intersect at the spacecraft as the apex – just simple spherical trigonometry. | ||
| - | |||
| <BR>[[#top]] | <BR>[[#top]] | ||
Revision as of 05:13, 7 December 2006
To compute an orbit one has to determine both the position and velocity vectors of the spacecraft; these provide six of the seven necessary orbit parameters, the other being the time of measurement. @@ A tracking station measures the range and two angles to a spacecraft from which first derivatives can be calculated - range rate and two angle rates. Orbit predictions can then be produced from three sets of such data obtained in a single pass over a precision tracking station. Data from lower capability tracking stations can achieve the same results by triangulation from three of more stations.
Contents |
The Requisites for Accurate Tracking
There are three basic requisites to achieve the required degree of tracking accuracy. The exact location of the tracking antenna must be established; the time, at which each tracking measurement is made, must be known precisely to a very high degree of accuracy; and the angular pointing of the antenna must be precisely calibrated.
A careful survey first establishes the positions of the antenna and its collimation tower. @@ A high precision tracking system also has an optical telescope built into its antenna, precisely aligned with the transmission axis. The collimation towers of such systems have a matching optical target and small antenna placed on the collimation tower in exactly the same relationship to each other as on the tracking antenna.
For tracking data to be meaningful every station in a network has to have its epoch (local clock) set on Universal Time @@ and synchronized to within a few tens of millionths of a second of each other. This is usually accomplished by each station having an ‘atomic’ clock driven by a Cesium beam oscillator (or equivalent) stable to one part in ten thousand million (1 in 1010) - out by no more than 3 millionths of a second in 10,000 years. So important was the accuracy of the station’s ‘tick’ to accurate tracking that a travelling master atomic clock visited each station clock after its installation to establish the ‘tick’, and, at regular intervals thereafter, to check and synchronize it. Where range is measured by CW transmission, the necessary frequency stability is achieved by generating the transmitter frequency from the extremely stable oscillations of the same atomic standard that provided the ‘tick’.
Finally, the pointing accuracy of each system is confirmed optically by pointing the tracking antenna to a sequence of programmed positions in the night sky to determine if selected stars pass the cross hairs of the telescope at precisely the predicted times. This would not happen if any of the three common conditions had not been met.
#top
The Nature of Tracking @@
A tracking signal is a propagated electromagnetic (radio) wave that travels at the speed of light; nearly 300,000 Km/sec. Several parameters - frequency, wavelength, velocity, amplitude, and directivity - can be determined for such a wave. @@ Measurement of these reveal several ‘particulars’ that are modified as a consequence of the path traveled by the wave: propagation time, phase delay, frequency shift and amplitude.
The amplitude of a signal, apart from telling us whether an antenna is pointed directly at the source of the signal, has no practical use in measuring range. The other three particulars are closely related, e.g. “a measurement of propagation time is actually a direct time measurement of the phase delay of the signal.” @@
A different technique of measurement has developed around each of the three remaining particulars. All use some form of phase delay measurement, and each of the six tracking systems at CRO utilized one or more of them.
Phase-delay or propagation-time measurement @@
Measurements of phase delay (or propagation time) are directly related to the total length of the transmission path, to the spacecraft and back again. When the ground transmitter and receiver are at the same place, the one-way trip time is exactly half of the total trip time. The range can then be easily calculated by multiplying the speed of light (c) by half the total-trip time (t), i.e. ct/2.
Either pulsed or CW signals can be used to determine range. With pulsed signals from radar systems the total-trip time is measured directly: it is the time interval between the transmission of a pulse from the radar and the reception of that same pulse returned by skin reflection or from the spacecraft transponder. @@
Carnarvon had two pulse radars, the FPQ-6 and the Verlort (VERy LOng Range Tracking) radar. The FPQ-6 radar had a built-in computer and was accurate enough to be able to develop a complete orbit prediction by calculating the necessary first derivatives from the angle and distance data it measured.
The process of determining phase delay is somewhat more complex with CW signals than it is with pulse signals. CW ranging depends on maintaining a coherent @@ relationship from the initial transmitted signals to a spacecraft transponder (which maintains the coherence) and back again to a phase comparison between the transmitted and received signals at the ground station. There were three examples of the CW ranging process at CRO.
An R&RR station consisted of an S-band system for near-Earth scientific missions and a VHF system for cis-lunar @@ space. The VHF system used six tones from 20kHz to 8Hz in 5:1 frequency increments. The tones below 4kHz were modulated onto a 4kHz sub-carrier to provide sufficient separation between the carrier and the side bands. Two tones at a time were transmitted; the lower tone produced the ranging information and the higher tone ensured a finer measurement resolution. A replica of the transmitted tone was phase shifted in the ground receiver until it matched the received low tone: the amount of shift was a direct measurement of the total-trip time. The lowest tone (8Hz) provided a non-ambiguous maximum range of 18,737km, just one twentieth of the distance to the Moon. Orbits with higher ranges can still be supported because of prior knowledge of the approximate range.
The S-band system used two higher tones, 500kHz and 100kHz, for even more precise resolution of range but otherwise operated just the same as the VHF system. After the USB code ranging system was designed an Ambiguity-Resolving Code (ARC) sub-system was retrofitted to R&RR to extend its non-ambiguous range capability to 1,213,597km, almost four times the distance to the Moon. It consisted of two pseudo-random @@ sub-codes of 255 and 127 bits combined to produce a combined code of 32385 bits. After an ambiguous tone result had been determined, the tones were removed and the ranging code was then modulated onto the 4kHz sub-carrier at 4000bps. The ground receiver phase shifted a replica of the ranging code in 500 bit steps by moving the two sub-codes by 10 bits and 5 bits respectively, until a bit-for-bit correlation was achieved with the received code; this gave a direct measurement of the total-trip time. Block stepping of sub-codes achieved a much faster result than by stepping the combined code one bit at a time.
The MSFN USB PRN @@ ranging system only ever used digital codes. These consisted of five pseudo-random codes, mostly of prime number length, combined to generate a 5,456,682-bit pseudo-random code transmitted at 100kbs and giving a maximum unambiguous range of 804,650km, nearly three times the distance to the Moon. The USB range resolution was ±1m, however system jitter and ground instabilities downgraded this to about ±15m. The correlation technique for the USB ranging codes was essentially the same as that of R&RR.
On both the USB and R&RR systems, digital and tone codes were removed once ranging had been achieved. The range of the spacecraft could then be maintained by integrating the range rate (Doppler) measurements and summing it with the already-measured range value.
#top
Phase-rate or Doppler measurement
Any movement of the spacecraft towards or away from the ground station will cause the returned carrier signal to show an apparent frequency shift, known as Doppler. The Doppler shift is directly proportional to the rate of change of path length from the transmitter to the spacecraft, i.e. range rate – the direct measurement of the first derivative of range. When the ground transmitter and receiver are at the same location the extracted frequency shift is ± 2D where D is the Doppler shift on the uplink signal.
It is important to note that Doppler shift only gives the range rate along the line extended from the transmitter through the spacecraft: when there is no relative movement there is zero Doppler shift. To get a complete three-dimensional picture, an R&RR spacecraft has three independent S-band transponders to enable three widely spaced tracking stations to simultaneously perform a triangulation on the spacecraft’s position and movement.
Similarly triangulation was performed on the Apollo spacecraft by three MSFN USB tracking stations such as Carnarvon (CRO), Honeysuckle Creek (HSK) and Hawaii (HAW). In this case only the prime station, HSK, got true Doppler from the Apollo’s single transponder while the other two stations extracted pseudo-Doppler based on their extremely high accuracy receiver reference frequencies. Even so, this solution was ten times more accurate than a single station track. @@
Spacecraft position may also be calculated entirely without angle data from three tracking stations using a triangulation technique with the known base-line lengths between the stations and the ranges from the three stations which intersect at the spacecraft as the apex – just simple spherical trigonometry.
#top
Relative–phase and interferometer-type measurement
The third technique relies on relative, rather than absolute, phase measurement. This technique can be the basis of tracking from a number of long base-line stations but at CRO it was used solely as an angle measurement technique.
Consider a tracking antenna that is pointing directly at a spacecraft. Each part of the Antenna’s surface will be equally distant from the spacecraft so there will be no apparent phase difference. If the antenna is pointing slightly away from the spacecraft, one edge of the antenna will now be closer and the opposite edge will be further away – a difference in signal path length. This will produce a ‘relative’ phase difference between the signals received by the two sides of the antenna: this difference can be used to generate an error signal that will drive the antenna to restore the phase balance.
Tracking antennas have two drive systems which act perpendicular to each other so that an antenna can be pointed to any point in the sky using the right combination of instructions to its two drive motors. The Acquisition Aid (Acq Aid) was a typical example. Its array of eighteen small turnstile antennas was evenly spread over a wire-screen ground plane. The signal outputs from each quadrant of the screen were summed so that they could be compared in specific ways to create the two sets of error signals. Each quadrant sum was split in two and each split was summed again in four pairs to form top-half, bottom-half, left-half, and right-half outputs. The phase difference between the ‘top’ and the ’bottom’ outputs, generates an ‘up-down’ error signal and that between the ‘left’ and ‘right’ outputs generates a ‘sideways’ error signal. The angle measurement technique on the R&RR VHF was essentially the same.
The Q6, Verlort, USB and R&RR S-band antennas were all parabolic dish reflectors focussing the received signal via a sub-reflector onto a four-aperture horn in the centre of the dish @@ . Signals from the four apertures generated error signals in essentially the same way, as did the four quadrants of the Acq Aid and the R&RR VHF antennas.
